proceeds of crime

Proceeds of Crime and Scheduled Offences Under the PMLA: Definition, the Schedule, and the Nexus Requirement

by
Proceeds of crime and scheduled offences under the PMLA — definition, Schedule and the nexus requirement. Top advocate lawyer PMLA ED Delhi

Two definitions decide every ED case: “proceeds of crime” and “scheduled offence.” If the property does not derive from a scheduled offence, there is no money laundering — no matter how suspicious the money looks. This guide explains the three limbs of Section 2(1)(u), the structure of the Schedule, and the nexus requirement the Supreme Court has enforced in Vijay Madanlal, Pavana Dibbur, and Seema Garg (with judgment links) — plus the practical defence angles I use to break the chain in practice.

How Third Parties With Legitimate Interests Can Contest Attachment Under the PMLA by the ED

by

The ED can attach the property of “any person” — not just the accused. Consequently, banks, buyers, and family members often find their assets frozen for someone else’s alleged crime. Drawing from my experience in PMLA matters, this guide explains how third parties with legitimate interests can contest attachment: the statutory scheme under Sections 5 and 8, the forums from the Adjudicating Authority to the High Court, what your reply must contain, and the landmark rulings — Axis Bank, Seema Garg, and others — where third parties actually won.

Introduction to Money Laundering, PMLA and ED Law in India: A Complete Guide

by
Introduction to PMLA and ED law in India — money laundering, ECIR, arrest, attachment and bail explained

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 arms the Enforcement Directorate with extraordinary powers — to summon, search, attach, and arrest. This cornerstone guide introduces PMLA and ED law in India in plain language. It explains the offence of money laundering under Section 3, proceeds of crime and scheduled offences, the ECIR, arrest safeguards under Section 19, attachment and confiscation, the Section 45 twin conditions for bail, and trial before Special Courts. Every concept is backed by verified Supreme Court rulings — from Vijay Madanlal Choudhary and Pankaj Bansal to Tarsem Lal and Manish Sisodia — making this the starting point of our complete PMLA series.

Leading Case Laws on ED and PMLA Matters: Landmark Supreme Court Judgments Every Practitioner Must Know

by
Leading case laws on ED and PMLA matters — landmark Supreme Court judgments on Section 45 bail, Section 19 arrest and ECIR

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 has become one of the most litigated statutes in India. This article traces the leading Supreme Court case laws that govern ED action — from Vijay Madanlal Choudhary upholding the ED’s powers, to Pankaj Bansal and Arvind Kejriwal on Section 19 arrest safeguards, Tarsem Lal barring arrest after cognizance, and Manish Sisodia on bail where trials are delayed. Each judgment is explained with the principle it laid down, covering Section 45 twin conditions, ECIR, Section 50 statements, sanction for public servants, and the effect of quashing the scheduled offence. An essential ready reckoner for practitioners and accused persons facing ED proceedings.